A number of reports and studies have analyzed how access to caregiver and community services can reduce the utilization of nursing homes. This article includes summaries of a number of research studies on how older people identify, select, and access eldercare services. Based on these studies, it appears useful services to improve community care might include needs assessments, information and referral (I&R) services, support groups, counseling programs, telephone "hotlines", informational pamphlets, and respite services.
A needs assessment, If done by an unbiased party, could help guide families in the decision-making process, and ensure they are aware of the full range of services and solutions available. Combined with I&R services, it could help determine the most appropriate and cost-effective site for services needed by the older person, by matching their needs and financial resources to the actual services available in the community. Many family members, unfamiliar with the full range of aging services available, assume that nursing home placement is the only alternative when an older person is unable to manage their own care at home. While that is sometimes the right solution, a good assessment process could ensure no better alternative exists before that decision is made.
One thing which keeps older people at home at a manageable cost is the support of informal, unpaid, caregivers, such as spouses, family members, and friends. Any attempts to reduce nursing home utilization must include support for these informal caregivers. They need help caring for the problems which have been found to predict nursing home placement, including cognitive disorders and difficulties with IADLs. They also need support and respite to continue to provide care without burning out. Providing assistance to the informal caregivers could extend the time they are able to keep care recipients at home. This assistance could include support groups, counseling, and respite services.
Good supervision of complex medical directions could prevent acute episodes and health declines caused by failure to follow those directions. One way to do this is to provide information and instruction to older people and their caregivers in understandable language using informational pamphlets, telephone "hotlines", or on-site visits to explain and confirm that instructions are followed and understood.
Consumers need better systems for comparing, assessing, and monitoring care alternatives to understand the real benefits and costs of each type of care. A decision to move Mom to a nursing home so she will receive better care makes no sense if she is moved to a place where she receives less attention that she received at home because of inadequate staffing. An inexpensive, but unmonitored, home care aide is a poor solution if he/she is abusive, fails to show up when scheduled, or steals money or valuables. Residents in institutional settings may suffer from a lack of personal choice about lifestyle issues like smoking, eating, and drinking due to restrictive regulations and provider concerns about liability.
Consumers also need good information about the real cost of each care alternative and the reimbursement available. A jerry-rigged patchwork of community resources may be more expensive than placement in assisted living or a nursing home, and may be more time-consuming to manage than caring for the older person in the home of a relative. Assisted living is an attractive option for people who don't need complex medical care, but may not be available to people without significant financial resources or good long term care insurance.
REFERENCES
A Systematic Comparison of Community Care Demonstrations
June 1987, by Robert Kemper, Robert Applebaum, and Margaret Harrigan, is a study of how availability of community care can impact nursing home costs and utilization. The study draws several conclusions:
Informal Caregiver Burnout, Predictors and Prevention
April 1993, ASPE Research Notes, analyzes what conditions are most likely to lead to failure of informal caregiver support and subsequent nursing home placement. Based on their research, they concluded the most likely reasons for individual caregivers to quit are:
They also concluded that the most likely predictors of nursing home placement are:
This 1998 testimony to the Institute of Medicine from American Medical Association discusses how better home care can reduce both hospitalizations and nursing home placement for frail older people. It states that for every patient in a nursing home, there are 3 similarly impaired people cared for at home by their families, and that 80% of homebound patients get all their care from family members. The report discusses the problems of "health illiteracy", stating that about half of all Americans would have trouble understanding and carrying out complicated medical directions, and that close to 70% of elderly people are "health illiterate". Since more than 12% of all hospitalizations are due to improperly taken medications, there is a significant opportunity to reduce healthcare costs by ensuring, through home care services, that complex medical instructions have been understood and followed. The report also points out that homebound elderly people have trouble arranging transportation, which makes it more difficult for physicians to monitor their care, could be alleviated by promoting physician house calls.
Improving Quality in Long-Term Care
February 1998 - This testimony to the Institute of Medicine from American Association of Retired Persons discusses quality assurance in nursing homes, supportive housing, and the home. They point out that consumers are demanding a higher quality of life, and they strongly prefer to receive supportive services in the most home-like environment possible. Improving technology and changing practices have made it possible to deliver care in a wider range of settings. All these changes mean that consumers have more choices than before, but state regulatory systems have had difficulty keeping up with the changes, and are under increasing budgetary pressure, so the assessment of the quality of care alternatives has become more difficult.
Some of the problems in nursing homes include inadequate nurse staffing, medication errors, use of restraints, and problems with dignity and quality of life. Inadequate reimbursement and inadequate funding of programs like the Ombudsman Program may also contribute to poor quality care. Supportive housing, including assisted living, has problems including cost-cutting strategies like shared rooms and baths, and inadequate staffing or services, especially for dementia patients. Another problem is the lack of standards and inadequate regulation of the industry. The lack of public funding means many of these programs are only available to the wealthy. Home care is inadequately regulated, suffers from a shortage of qualified, well-trained workers, and has no good quality-assurance system.
Improving Quality in Long Term Care
March 1998 - This testimony to the Institute of Medicine from American Medical Directors Association discusses the role of physicians in nursing homes. It states that reimbursement rather than appropriateness drives placement decisions, and that new Medicare reimbursement rules for nursing homes are likely to discourage them from accepting patients with complex care needs in favor of those with lesser needs. At the same time, assisted living facilities are attempting to retain residents with increasing care needs, which they may be unable to manage, and home health reimbursement is being scaled back, reducing access to home care services. All these issues muddy placement and treatment decisions for older people.
The AMDA is concerned about the lack of medical oversight in all care settings, and the need to strengthen the role of physicians and medical directors. They are concerned that current reimbursement systems are inadequate to provide that oversight. They also recommend extensive consumer education and vigorous advocacy to protect elderly people and their surrogate decision-makers.
Improving Quality in Long Term Care
March 1998 testimony to the Institute of Medicine from Consumers United for Assisted Living discusses ways assisted living can impact the care of older people. They point out that a jerry-rigged patchwork of community resources may be more expensive than placement in assisted living or a nursing home, and may be more time-consuming to manage than caring for the older person in the home of a relative. While they believe that assisted living provides a good solution for many families, they are concerned about the real estate mentality of many providers, the risk of importing the problems of the nursing home industry into this setting, the inadequacy of regulations, and the affordability of this housing.
What is Quality Care for Persons With Alzheimers Disease?
March 1998 testimony to the Institute of Medicine from Alzheimer's Association discusses the importance to family members of issues like the quality of staff, staff turnover, staff/resident ratios, the quality of service programs, and the safety of the environment in assessing the quality of institutional programs for people with Alzheimers.
Improving Quality in Long Term Care
March 1998 testimony to the Institute of Medicine from American College of Health Care Administrators discussed the importance of maintaining quality of life in institutional settings, and the fact that current regulations make it difficult to allow residents personal choice about things which involve risk, like eating unhealthy foods, smoking and drinking. The report discusses the need for regulatory systems to focus on outcomes and resident satisfaction, rather than prescribing processes.
The testimony describes changes in the various elements of the long term care continuum, and the lack of communication and integration across that continuum.
Making Decisions About Long Term Care: Voices of Elderly People and Their Families
Making Decisions About Long Term Care: Views From Professionals
This research into how families make long term care decisions from SPRY indicates that families need more information to make educated decisions. Families said they are highly influenced by their physicians, but that the physicians often didn't have good information about options, either. Decisions are often made in crisis, in an atmosphere of fear, guilt, and denial, and without complete information. Both projects emphasize the importance of providing good information to families so that appropriate decisions are made.
A number of reports and studies have analyzed how access to caregiver and community services can reduce the utilization of nursing homes. This article includes summaries of a number of research studies on how older people identify, select, and access eldercare services. Based on these studies, it appears useful services to improve community care might include needs assessments, information and referral (I&R) services, support groups, counseling programs, telephone "hotlines", informational pamphlets, and respite services.
Kenneth M. Langa, MD, PhD led a team from the University of Michigan studied the differences in home care services used by people who lived alone and those who lived with others in 1993 and 995. They investigated whether the large growth in paid home care services that took place during the early to mid-1990s was targeted to individuals with higher levels of disability and lower levels of social support, groups which historically have been more likely to use paid home care services and are at higher risk for nursing home admission. The researchers concluded that the large increase in formal home care services provided during the period of their study went disproportionately to those with greater social support, and that home care policy changes in the early 1990s resulted in a shift in the distribution of home care services toward the elderly living with their children. The report is published in the February issue of Medical Care.
Kenneth M. Langa, MD, PhD led a team from the University of Michigan studied the differences in home care services used by people who lived alone and those who lived with others in 1993 and 995. They investigated whether the large growth in paid home care services that took place during the early to mid-1990s was targeted to individuals with higher levels of disability and lower levels of social support, groups which historically have been more likely to use paid home care services and are at higher risk for nursing home admission. The researchers concluded that the large increase in formal home care services provided during the period of their study went disproportionately to those with greater social support, and that home care policy changes in the early 1990s resulted in a shift in the distribution of home care services toward the elderly living with their children. The report is published in the February issue of Medical Care.
The British Medical Journal reports that a majority exists within the Scottish parliament in favor of providing free personal care for older Scots. This action came in response to a report from the Royal Commission on Long Term Care for the Elderly which recommended making personal services free to all. It has been estimated that it will cost ?110m ($165m) a year to pay for the improved package of care in Scotland. The personal services the Commission recommended covering include:
Personal toilet (washing, bathing, skin care, personal presentation, dressing and undressing and skin care)
Eating and drinking (as opposed to obtaining and preparing food and drink)
Managing urinary and bowel functions (including maintaining continence and managing incontinence)
Managing problems associated with immobility
Management of prescribed treatment (e.g. administration and monitoring medication)
Behavior management and ensuring personal safety (for example, for those with cognitive impairment - minimizing stress and risk)
The British Medical Journal reports that a majority exists within the Scottish parliament in favor of providing free personal care for older Scots. This action came in response to a report from the Royal Commission on Long Term Care for the Elderly which recommended making personal services free to all. It has been estimated that it will cost ?110m ($165m) a year to pay for the improved package of care in Scotland. The personal services the Commission recommended covering include:
Personal toilet (washing, bathing, skin care, personal presentation, dressing and undressing and skin care)
The Department of Health and Hospitals is holding a meeting to receive input and recommendations toward developing a comprehensive strategy to provide more community-based services to people with disabilities and to those requiring long-term care. The meeting is set for Thursday, January 25 in Baton Rouge.
People with interests in elderly affairs, mental health, developmental disabilities/mental retardation, physical disabilities and substance abuse are invited to attend this planning meeting. According to Raymond Jetson, DHH's advisor for special populations, the meeting continues the department's commitment toward making more integrated community-based services a priority. "This is the first step in reaffirming our vision for meeting the future needs of people with disabilities and those who are aging," he said. "The reality is that the state's fiscal problems mean that we will continue to see the overall level of spending on health care decline. This fact reinforces our mission to seek more efficient and effective ways to provide care and services in community-based settings."
He said the department's working vision for the elderly and people with disabilities will be on the DHH website beginning January 25. For people without Internet access, libraries offer this service. Interested persons can also write to Jetson at P.O. Box 629, Baton Rouge, LA 70821-0629 and send him their comments and questions.
"I encourage people to review and comment on this statement," Jetson said. "The website will allow for people to provide input even if they do not attend the meeting. These comments will then be used to help us develop a comprehensive strategy to move forward."
The Department of Health and Hospitals is holding a meeting to receive input and recommendations toward developing a comprehensive strategy to provide more community-based services to people with disabilities and to those requiring long-term care. The meeting is set for Thursday, January 25 in Baton Rouge.
People with interests in elderly affairs, mental health, developmental disabilities/mental retardation, physical disabilities and substance abuse are invited to attend this planning meeting. According to Raymond Jetson, DHH's advisor for special populations, the meeting continues the department's commitment toward making more integrated community-based services a priority. "This is the first step in reaffirming our vision for meeting the future needs of people with disabilities and those who are aging," he said. "The reality is that the state's fiscal problems mean that we will continue to see the overall level of spending on health care decline. This fact reinforces our mission to seek more efficient and effective ways to provide care and services in community-based settings."
Attorney General Mike Fisher announced that his Bureau of Consumer Protection has obtained a nearly $400,000 judgment against a Pittsburgh home care company and its owner, who were accused of selling non-medical in-home services to more than 90 elderly Pennsylvanians even though they had no ability or intention of providing the services.
"These defendants are permanently barred from having any business dealings with older Pennsylvanians," Fisher said. "The judgment forever bans them from advertising or selling any goods or services to Pennsylvania residents age 60 or older. In addition, they are required to pay nearly $400,000 in consumer restitution, civil penalties and investigation costs."
Fisher said the judgment was obtained against Amfed Homecare Corp., 100 Wise Hill Rd., Fox Chapel, and its president, William Livorio. The defendants were sued by Fisher's Office in February 2000 for numerous violations of Pennsylvania's Consumer Protection Law.
Attorney General Mike Fisher announced that his Bureau of Consumer Protection has obtained a nearly $400,000 judgment against a Pittsburgh home care company and its owner, who were accused of selling non-medical in-home services to more than 90 elderly Pennsylvanians even though they had no ability or intention of providing the services.
"These defendants are permanently barred from having any business dealings with older Pennsylvanians," Fisher said. "The judgment forever bans them from advertising or selling any goods or services to Pennsylvania residents age 60 or older. In addition, they are required to pay nearly $400,000 in consumer restitution, civil penalties and investigation costs."
Iowa is set to receive more than $300 million in federal money to expand home- and community-based services for the elderly, according to Governor Tom Vilsack. The money is intended to keep older Iowans in their own homes longer, saving money in the long run by limiting the use of expensive nursing-home care. The money also would open new options for disabled adults, who often end up in nursing homes.
The state knew it would receive about $95 million in federal money. Additional payments were uncertain, however, because federal officials were working to close a loophole that allowed Iowa and 18 other states to get the Medicaid money. New federal rules mean that Iowa will receive the full amount it had been seeking, totaling more than $300 million, Vilsack announced at his weekly news conference. He said a challenge to the new rules was unlikely.
The $300 million will be placed in the state's new 'senior Living Trust." The money will help Iowa expand in-home and assisted-living options that are cheaper than nursing-home care. The grant program allows funding consideration for conversion of nursing facility beds to affordable assisted living units, and for development of Home and Community Based Services such as adult day care, respite care services, child care for children with special needs, and safe shelter for victims of dependent adult abuse. It is anticipated that $20,000,000 will be available for these grants for capital or one-time expenditures, including expenses for start-up, training and operation losses associated with the first year of development. Eligible applicants include licensed nursing facilities and other providers of long-term care services.
?With the proper investment of these new resources, our comprehensive ?Senior Living Trust? long-term care system will become the model for the rest of the nation. We will be able to create a system that is consumer directed based on the principles of independence, quality, dignity, privacy, and personal choice,? Vilsack said.
The state could then save about $73 million in annual Medicaid costs by 2004, Vilsack said. Iowa received its first payment - $95 million - this month. Officials estimate that Iowa would receive $112 million in 2001, $106 million in 2002 and $24 million in 2003.
Iowa is set to receive more than $300 million in federal money to expand home- and community-based services for the elderly, according to Governor Tom Vilsack. The money is intended to keep older Iowans in their own homes longer, saving money in the long run by limiting the use of expensive nursing-home care. The money also would open new options for disabled adults, who often end up in nursing homes.
The state knew it would receive about $95 million in federal money. Additional payments were uncertain, however, because federal officials were working to close a loophole that allowed Iowa and 18 other states to get the Medicaid money. New federal rules mean that Iowa will receive the full amount it had been seeking, totaling more than $300 million, Vilsack announced at his weekly news conference. He said a challenge to the new rules was unlikely.
The Office of Inspector General of the Health Care Financing Administration (OIG-HCFA) investigated claims that home health agency (HHA) placements have become more problematic since reimbursement was reduced with the implementation of the Interim Payment System (IPS). They say that their data shows a 25% decrease in HHAs from 1997 to 1999, which some of them attribute to IPS. The report says that 85% of discharge planners reported no problems in placing patients, 9% report problems with 5% or more of their placements and the rest report they have problems with placements less than 5% of the time.
In spite of these findings, which they categorize as insignificant problems, the OIG made some disturbing observations. They report that there appears to be a drop in home health care staffing in some areas. About one quarter of discharge planners report home health staffing shortages in their area have contributed to delays in placement, which they most commonly attribute to IPS. They explain that because of low reimbursement, they believe that HHAs have cut back on staffing or have closed. These discharge planners say that the remaining staff have been unable to provide care for everyone who needs home care in their area. Other discharge planners cite labor market forces when asked about the cause of staff shortages. These discharge planners say that, in some areas, nurses and home health aides are simply in short supply.
They also report that during the placement process, home health agencies are now looking more carefully at whether patients meet Medicare homebound and skilled need eligibility requirements, which may be a result of recent enforcement activities by the OIG-HCFA. Some discharge planners suggest agencies are using information on medical condition and service needs to screen certain patients. On the occasions when there are placement delays, discharge planners most commonly cite problems with patients needing IV antibiotics or expensive drugs. They also cite delays in placing patients who have decubitus ulcers or who need other wound care, as well as those who need rehabilitation. On average, about a third of those who cite delays due to medical conditions attribute these delays directly to the interim payment system.
The Office of Inspector General of the Health Care Financing Administration (OIG-HCFA) investigated claims that home health agency (HHA) placements have become more problematic since reimbursement was reduced with the implementation of the Interim Payment System (IPS). They say that their data shows a 25% decrease in HHAs from 1997 to 1999, which some of them attribute to IPS. The report says that 85% of discharge planners reported no problems in placing patients, 9% report problems with 5% or more of their placements and the rest report they have problems with placements less than 5% of the time.
The Prime Minister and the other Canadian Ministers met in Ottawa September 11 and issued a "Health Communique." In it, they promised that the federal government would work with provinces and territories to improve Canadian health care. Among other things, they stressed they are committed to strengthened investment in home care and community care as critical components of a more fully integrated health system. They also promised that in order to ensure Canadians continue to have access to new, appropriate and cost-effective drugs, they will work together and mandate their Health Ministers to develop strategies for assessing the cost-effectiveness of prescription drugs, and will create a common intergovernmental advisory process to assess drugs for potential inclusion in government drug plans.
The Prime Minister and the other Canadian Ministers met in Ottawa September 11 and issued a "Health Communique." In it, they promised that the federal government would work with provinces and territories to improve Canadian health care. Among other things, they stressed they are committed to strengthened investment in home care and community care as critical components of a more fully integrated health system. They also promised that in order to ensure Canadians continue to have access to new, appropriate and cost-effective drugs, they will work together and mandate their Health Ministers to develop strategies for assessing the cost-effectiveness of prescription drugs, and will create a common intergovernmental advisory process to assess drugs for potential inclusion in government drug plans.