Medicaid

My Predictions

Description: 

As I look to the future of this industry, I see several inescapable trends:

  • The number of people who will need care will explode as the Baby Boom generation ages.
  • The number of people who are working and paying taxes to pay for Medicaid and Medicare will decline, relative to the older population, so the pool of money that will be available for Medicaid long term care will rise at a far slower rate than the increase in the older population.
  • Many people who do have savings will exhaust most of their funds before they get to a nursing home, and most nursing homes will have 90-100% of their residents dependent on Medicaid, reducing the financial viability of the industry.

I think these trends will lead to the following potential scenarios:

  • Governments will be forced to greatly restrict and reduce the amount of money they reimburse providers for each Medicaid long term care recipient, and long term care providers will have to develop a strategy to operate with a growing percentage of Medicaid recipients and a sharply declining Medicaid reimbursement rate.
  • Nursing home operators will divide into two groups: Medicaid-only and non-Medicaid. The Medicaid-only facilities will shave every possible cost and find ways to provide only the bare minimum of services in a very cost-efficient operation. Although they will attempt to attract private pay residents, people with resources will not be attracted to their poorly-maintained buildings and low service levels. These facilities will become the "poor farms" of the future. Non-Medicaid facilities will accept only those who have the funds to pay for the cost of their care, providing a quality facility and a level of service commensurate with the amount the resident is willing and able to pay, and these facilities will become the facilities of choice for those who have the means to afford them.
  • If  nursing home operations remain unprofitable, or if operators are precluded from trying to make a profit by isolating private paying residents in facilities that have higher costs, many operators will exit the business entirely. If many providers exit the business, the supply of available nursing home beds will decline significantly. Ironically, this might finally allow the remaining operators to be more selective in determining how many low-paying Medicaid residents they will accept.
  • Governments may encourage or require assisted living operators to accept Medicaid payments in an effort to control program costs by shifting Medicaid long term care recipients from nursing homes to assisted living facilities. That would force assisted living operators to take the same steps nursing homes have had to take to reduce their exposure to low Medicaid reimbursement.
  • At some point, governments may have to reduce the number of people on Medicaid by  increasing the eligibility requirements for Medicaid . They can do this by lowering the income and asset caps, increasing the "medical necessity" requirements, or requiring the personal residence to be included as an asset when determining Medicaid eligibility. 
  • Governments may also have to reduce the number of services they provide for those who do qualify and/or develop some sort of "rationing" program to allocate resources and services, perhaps by limiting availability of expensive procedures and services for people who are too ill or too old. 
  • Governments are also likely become more aggressive in looking to family members to help pay for care costs. They may regulate and enforce tighter restrictions on giving assets away to family members when those assets could have been used to pay for care for Medicaid recipients. They may try to recover assets retrospectively from those who received them, or require family members to make contributions toward the cost of care to supplement the government contribution.
  • Medicaid will continue to exist in some form for the truly indigent, however Medicaid recipients will probably have to accept a lesser quality of services. They will probably have to go on waiting lists for services, and will find they are unable to use the providers they prefer. Some people who would be eligible for Medicaid under today's programs will not be eligible under the Medicaid programs of the future.

The implications in planning for future long term care needs are:

  • Long term care recipients will be divided into the "haves" and the "have nots" -- those who can pay for it themselves and those dependent on the Medicaid system. Although this won't be a palatable or desirable situation, any attempt to make long term care costs universally available at taxpayer cost will quickly torpedoed when the costs are calculated, since neither the federal nor the state governments could possibly afford to provide a comprehensive long term care benefit to the huge numbers of Baby Boomers that will be entering the system.
  • Medicaid will be available as a safety net when everything else is exhausted, but it will probably involve forfeiting any inheritance that would otherwise be left to other family members, may require supplementation from family members, and will probably leave the spouse with very limited financial resources. Medicaid recipients will have a limited ability to control where they receive services and what services are available to them.
  • People who are able to pay for their care with savings or insurance will have the easiest access to services and the most ability to control what kind of care they receive and where they receive it, regardless of what happens to government reimbursement programs. They will be highly attractive to service providers who are likely to compete strongly for their attention.

Conclusion

My conclusion after looking into the future is that Baby Boomers should be saving and investing enough to be able to pay privately for whatever long term care they may need, and they probably need to investigate buying long term care insurance to supplement those investments to ensure they are able to avoid dependence on government long term care programs.

As I look to the future of this industry, I see several inescapable trends:

  • The number of people who will need care will explode as the Baby Boom generation ages.
  • The number of people who are working and paying taxes to pay for Medicaid and Medicare will decline, relative to the older population, so the pool of money that will be available for Medicaid long term care will rise at a far slower rate than the increase in the older population.
  • Many people who do have savings will exhaust most of their funds before they get to a nursing home, and most nursing homes will have 90-100% of their residents dependent on Medicaid, reducing the financial viability of the industry.

I think these trends will lead to the following potential scenarios:

Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)

Description: 
Summary: A program to provide in-home care to elderly individuals who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, and who are at risk of needing nursing home care.

The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) combines Medicare and Medicaid benefits to provide in-home services for some seniors. The program started out as a demonstration as the On-Lok prgram in San Francisco, and has spread to a number of other states. Unfortunately, PACE openings are extremely limited, so not everyone who might qualify will be able to get services. The federal and state governments are working to expand the program, but it currently provides services to a fairly small number of recipients.

Participants must be at least 55 years old, live in the PACE service area, and be certified as eligible for nursing home care by the appropriate State agency. The PACE program becomes the sole source of services for Medicare and Medicaid eligible enrollees.

An interdisciplinary team, consisting of professional and paraprofessional staff, assesses participants' needs, develops care plans, and delivers all services (including acute care services and when necessary, nursing facility services) which are integrated for a seamless provision of total care. PACE programs provide social and medical services primarily in an adult day health center, supplemented by in-home and referral services in accordance with the participant's needs. The PACE service package must include all Medicare and Medicaid covered services, and other services determined necessary by the multidisciplinary team for the care of the PACE participant.

Summary: A program to provide in-home care to elderly individuals who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, and who are at risk of needing nursing home care.

The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) combines Medicare and Medicaid benefits to provide in-home services for some seniors. The program started out as a demonstration as the On-Lok prgram in San Francisco, and has spread to a number of other states. Unfortunately, PACE openings are extremely limited, so not everyone who might qualify will be able to get services. The federal and state governments are working to expand the program, but it currently provides services to a fairly small number of recipients.

Federal Poverty Guidelines

Description: 
Summary: Look up guidelines by year, state, and size of household.

To make it easier to figure out what income levels may be applicable for various public assistance programs, I have created a calculator that allows you to look up guidelines by year, state, and size of household.

Many public assistance programs calculate eligibility by comparing income to the federal poverty level (FPL). These programs include Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and many state drug assistance programs. Often the programs provide different levels of benefits to people based on some percentage of the FPL, often using criteria like "175% of FPL". The FPL is changed every year, and varies based on the number of people in the household and the part of the country they live in.

Look Up Federal Poverty Level (FPL) Guidelines

FPL Calculation
Year:
State:
Multiplier:
# in Household:

Summary: Look up guidelines by year, state, and size of household.

To make it easier to figure out what income levels may be applicable for various public assistance programs, I have created a calculator that allows you to look up guidelines by year, state, and size of household.

Many public assistance programs calculate eligibility by comparing income to the federal poverty level (FPL). These programs include Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and many state drug assistance programs. Often the programs provide different levels of benefits to people based on some percentage of the FPL, often using criteria like "175% of FPL". The FPL is changed every year, and varies based on the number of people in the household and the part of the country they live in.

Look Up Federal Poverty Level (FPL) Guidelines

FPL Calculation
Year:
State:
Multiplier:
# in Household:

Medicaid

Description: 

The Medicaid system (also called Welfare, Medical Assistance, Medi-Cal, and a variety of other names) was also developed in 1965, and is intended to provide comprehensive health care to people who have no income or assets to cover the costs of their own care. It is funded half by the federal government and half by the states, and each state has broad flexibility to establish payment rates, determine eligibility, and decide what services they will cover under the program. This is the only government program that provides for long term care, including nursing home stays of any length, prescription drugs, and some in-home and assisted living services. 

The current regulations do not consider the value of a personal residence in calculating whether someone is poor enough to qualify for Medicaid, even though the equity in their home is the largest asset that most older people have. Since that value is excluded in the Medicaid eligibility determination, someone with significant equity in a home might be able to qualify for Medicaid. Nursing home residents may be on Medicaid because they had no assets prior to entering a nursing home, or because they exhausted their assets paying for the care once they got there. In addition, many attorneys provide information to people who would otherwise not qualify for Medicaid on how they can gift or re-structure their income and assets so that the government will pay for the cost of their nursing home stay. For one or another of these reasons, about 70% of the people in nursing homes today are on the Medicaid rolls.

The future of Medicaid is much less clear than the future of Medicare. Unlike Medicare and Social Security, there is no "trust fund" for Medicaid expenses, it's a strictly pay-as-you-go system. Because the states provide half the funding, the program is subject to fiscal pressures when either the federal government or the states have budget problems. There have already been a number of crisis situations in various states when they were forced to make major changes in Medicaid services or reimbursement in order to balance their budgets. Those pressures are likely to increase as more and more people get old enough to require expensive services like nursing home care.

The Medicaid system (also called Welfare, Medical Assistance, Medi-Cal, and a variety of other names) was also developed in 1965, and is intended to provide comprehensive health care to people who have no income or assets to cover the costs of their own care. It is funded half by the federal government and half by the states, and each state has broad flexibility to establish payment rates, determine eligibility, and decide what services they will cover under the program. This is the only government program that provides for long term care, including nursing home stays of any length, prescription drugs, and some in-home and assisted living services. 

Medicaid

Description: 

Medicaid - (or Medical Assistance, Welfare, Public Aid) the USA's national program for health and long term care costs for the elderly who have exhausted all their assets.The program is administered by the states, and eligibility and benefits vary widely. For the most specific information, use the Regional Information section of this page.

Medicaid - (or Medical Assistance, Welfare, Public Aid) the USA's national program for health and long term care costs for the elderly who have exhausted all their assets.The program is administered by the states, and eligibility and benefits vary widely. For the most specific information, use the Regional Information section of this page.

1960-1969

Summary: Government payments escalate, Nursing home quality concerns escalate, Medicare and Medicaid are created and costs explode, Medicare/Medicaid statistics, Medicare slashes nursing home coverage, The "Fevered Fifty" soar and crash.

Medicaid Personal Property Rules Changed

Description: 

The Social Security Administration has revised the rules for counting the value of personal property when determining eligibility for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). The new rules will make it easier to qualify by clarifying that there will be no limit on the dollar value of personal property or a vehicle used by the recipient or a member of his or her household. The rule also states that gifts of clothing will no longer count as income. The changes to SSI eligibility impact Medicaid because anyone who qualifies for SSI is automatically eligible for Medicaid as well.

The explanation of the rule change was printed in the Federal Register February 7, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 24):

"We are revising our regulations that explain how we determine an individual's income and resources under the supplemental security income (SSI) program in order to achieve three program simplifications. First, we are eliminating clothing from the definition of income and from the definition of in-kind support and maintenance. As a result, we generally will not count gifts of clothing as income when we decide whether a person can receive SSI benefits or when we compute the amount of the benefits. Second, we are changing our resource-counting rules in the SSI program by eliminating the dollar value limit for the exclusion of household goods and personal effects."

"As a result, we will not count household goods and personal effects as resources when we decide whether a person can receive SSI benefits. Third, we are changing our rules for excluding an automobile in determining the resources of an SSI applicant or recipient. We will exclude one automobile (the 'first' automobile) from resources if it is used for transportation for the individual or a member of the individual's household, without consideration of its value. These changes will simplify our rules, making them less cumbersome to administer and easier for the public to understand and follow. Our experience of nearly 30 years of processing SSI claims indicates that these simplifications will have minimal effect on the outcome of SSI eligibility determinations."

DATES: These regulations are effective on March 9, 2005.

The Social Security Administration has revised the rules for counting the value of personal property when determining eligibility for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). The new rules will make it easier to qualify by clarifying that there will be no limit on the dollar value of personal property or a vehicle used by the recipient or a member of his or her household. The rule also states that gifts of clothing will no longer count as income. The changes to SSI eligibility impact Medicaid because anyone who qualifies for SSI is automatically eligible for Medicaid as well.

The explanation of the rule change was printed in the Federal Register February 7, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 24):

Medicaid Pressures State Budgets

Description: 

PRESS RELEASE

Spending Pressures Continue Despite Revenue Growth
Recovery Continues, but Rise in Medicaid Costs Outstrip Growth in Revenue

WASHINGTON--Despite the gradual improvement in the nation's economy, states, increasingly burdened by rising health care and Medicaid costs, continue to recover slowly from the worst fiscal crisis in the last six decades, according to the National Governors Association (NGA) and the National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO).

In a report released today, The Fiscal Survey of States, NGA and NASBO found that revenue collections are now narrowly exceeding budgeted estimates in nearly all states in fiscal 2004. However, state spending pressures, specifically costs associated with health care, remain especially significant. Moreover, Medicaid continues to grow at high rates with no relief in sight.

"It's important to remember that we have just come through a tremendously difficult fiscal period, one in which we are only now beginning to see relief," said NGA Executive Director Raymond C. Scheppach. "The light at the end of the tunnel is beginning to appear; unfortunately, it's a long tunnel. Are states better off than they were a couple years ago? Certainly. Are they where they want to be or where they should be? No way, and that is attributable to the rising health care costs."

During fiscal 2005, Medicaid is estimated to grow as high as 12.1 percent due in part to the expiring federal fiscal relief. Long term growth of Medicaid is expected to be a hefty 8 to 9 percent--well above expected state revenue growth. In fact, according to NASBO's State Expenditure Report, estimates for fiscal 2004 revealed that for the first time ever, Medicaid is now a larger component of total state spending than elementary and secondary education combined.

While state finances are showing signs of improvement, state expenditures have increased slightly after being flat for a two-year period. State spending is expected to grow at 3.0 percent and 4.5 percent respectively in 2004 and 2005, below the 6.3 annual average since 1979, when the Fiscal Survey began tracking budget data.

"While there is relative improvement from the fiscal malaise of the past few years, our findings show that states' fiscal situations will remain difficult for the foreseeable future," said Scott Pattison, executive director of NASBO. "Medicaid spending continues to be driving state budgets. The bottom line is that the pressure from Medicaid and other skyrocketing health care costs makes it difficult for states to completely recover from these difficult fiscal times."

To control rising Medicaid costs, states have employed aggressive actions over the past four years. According to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation study, all 50 states implemented at least one new Medicaid cost containment strategy in fiscal 2004. Despite states' best efforts, Kaiser Foundation says, 35 states experienced Medicaid shortfalls in fiscal 2003 and 34 states anticipated shortfalls in fiscal 2004.

"The growth rate on Medicaid is rapidly reaching its breaking point. While the federal fiscal relief package that ended in June was a welcome reprieve for states, it was only a temporary band-aid for a much more serious ailment," Scheppach said. "States are employing a variety of cost containment strategies, but serious structural changes to Medicaid are necessary if they are to meet the needs of the nation's burgeoning senior population in the years to come."

In a sign that the national economy is continuing to improve, 15 states reduced their enacted budgets in fiscal 2004 by more than $2 billion, down from 40 states in fiscal 2003 that cut previously enacted budgets by nearly $12 billion. Three states report negative growth budgets in fiscal 2005, down significantly from fiscal 2003 when 21 states enacted negative growth budgets.

Following numerous years in which states did not meet growth expectations, revenue collections in fiscal 2004 narrowly exceeded budget estimates in 35 states. Ten states met their expected revenue targets, and only five states reported revenue estimates below original projections for the last fiscal year. In fiscal 2005, 24 states enacted tax and fee changes accounting for about $3.5 billion with more than $888.4 million coming from cigarette and tobacco taxes, and $710.6 million coming from sales taxes.

"After several years during which collections failed to meet targets, seemingly no matter how low states set their sights, a measure of revenue stability has returned. As economic recovery continues, state tax collections have become more robust," the report says. "However, from a budget perspective the margin of revenue security is narrow, even more so considering the spending pressures states are under, and states still face fundamental challenges regarding how they collect taxes and on what."

Against a backdrop of soaring health care costs and sluggish revenue growth, states are employing a variety of budget-balancing efforts. "Even though the overall fiscal situation seems to be getting better in many states, most are still keeping expenditures reigned in, especially considering pent-up demand that resulted from the recent fiscal crisis," the report says.

In addition to spending and revenue, year-end balances are another bellwether of the fiscal health of states. And, according the report, the total balances in the last few years "remain below what are generally considered an adequate financial cushion." The total balances for fiscal 2003 were $16.4 billion or 3.2 percent of expenditures, $25.3 billion or 4.8 percent of expenditures in fiscal 2004, and $18.6 billion or 3.4 percent of expenditures in fiscal 2005.

The Fiscal Survey of States assembles data self-reported by states on their general fund budgets. General fund budgets are the current operational plans states use to finance most broad-based state programs and services and thus are the most important element in determining states' overall fiscal health. General funds constitute about one-half of state expenditures. States also make expenditures from other dedicated state funds (such as for education or transportation), from bonds and federal grants-in-aid.

NASBO conducted the field survey between July and November 2004 and governors' state budget officers completed the surveys. Fiscal 2003 data represent actual figures, fiscal 2004 figures are preliminary, and fiscal 2005 data reflect appropriated budgets.

PRESS RELEASE

Spending Pressures Continue Despite Revenue Growth
Recovery Continues, but Rise in Medicaid Costs Outstrip Growth in Revenue

WASHINGTON--Despite the gradual improvement in the nation's economy, states, increasingly burdened by rising health care and Medicaid costs, continue to recover slowly from the worst fiscal crisis in the last six decades, according to the National Governors Association (NGA) and the National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO).

In a report released today, The Fiscal Survey of States, NGA and NASBO found that revenue collections are now narrowly exceeding budgeted estimates in nearly all states in fiscal 2004. However, state spending pressures, specifically costs associated with health care, remain especially significant. Moreover, Medicaid continues to grow at high rates with no relief in sight.

Ohio Commission Recommends Medicaid Changes

Description: 

The Ohio Commission to Reform Medicaid recommends numerous program cuts to help balance the state budget, including the follow suggestions:

* Allow nursing home reimbursement to be set by administrative action rather than statute and cut reimbursement to nursing home providers by 3%
* Expand estate recovery by broadening the list of assets that can be recovered
* Implement "cash and counseling" voucher programs and other programs that allow consumers to participate in savings if they use less expensive programs
* Reduce the number of drugs that Medicaid will cover
* Step up pre-admission screening efforts to divert people away from nursing homes.

View report at: http://www.ohiomedicaidreform.com/

The Ohio Commission to Reform Medicaid recommends numerous program cuts to help balance the state budget, including the follow suggestions:

* Allow nursing home reimbursement to be set by administrative action rather than statute and cut reimbursement to nursing home providers by 3%
* Expand estate recovery by broadening the list of assets that can be recovered
* Implement "cash and counseling" voucher programs and other programs that allow consumers to participate in savings if they use less expensive programs
* Reduce the number of drugs that Medicaid will cover
* Step up pre-admission screening efforts to divert people away from nursing homes.

Grants Made for Medicaid Cash and Counseling Program

Description: 

For more information, contact:
Joe Sutherland or Colleen Chapman,
301-652-1558

Model Program that Improves Quality of Life for Elderly Medicaid Beneficiaries and Those with Disabilities Expands to 11 New States

Evaluation of Original Three-State Cash & Counseling Program Found Participants Much More Satisfied with Services Received When They Direct Their Own Care. Expanded Program will Give Thousands More the Opportunity to Exercise Choice and Control Over the Supportive Services They Receive

BOSTON (October 7, 2004) '“ Funders of the original three-state Cash & Counseling program announced today that 11 new states will receive three-year grants of approximately $250,000 each to replicate and expand the successful program, which allows people eligible to receive supportive services through Medicaid to direct their own care and live more independently. The program is funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) and the Administration on Aging (AOA) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

An independent evaluation of the original Cash & Counseling program by Mathematica Policy Research Inc. found that, in all three participating states, when Medicaid beneficiaries of various ages and disabilities were given the opportunity to direct their own supportive services and hire their own caregivers, their quality of life improved, satisfaction with services increased, unmet needs for care were reduced, and access to home care increased ¾ without compromising beneficiaries'™ health or safety (relative to randomly assigned control groups that received services from agencies).

And while impacts on the use and costs of Medicaid services are not yet available for all three Cash & Counseling programs, results from one (whose evaluation was completed earlier than the others) show that by the second year of enrollment, the consumer-directed option cost no more than agency care, due to lower spending for nursing home and other Medicaid services.

'œWe'™re thrilled to be able to expand this program to 11 new states because it was so obviously a winner for participants in Arkansas, Florida, and New Jersey,' said Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, MD, MBA, president and CEO of RWJF.

'œThis is wonderful news for elderly and younger people with disabilities,' said HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson. 'œThis successful model program will allow caregivers and beneficiaries to live independently and with the freedom they desire.'

Under the new Cash & Counseling program, 11 states received approximately $250,000 to replicate the program, and two of those states received an additional $100,000 to expand the model.

The 11 new Cash & Counseling State Programs are:

Alabama Department of Senior Services, $250,000
Iowa Department of Human Services, $250,000
Kentucky Department for Medicaid Services, $250,000
Michigan Department of Community Health, $250,000
Minnesota Department of Human Services, $350,000
New Mexico Aging and Long Term Service Department, $349, 153
Pennsylvania Governor'™s Office of Health Care Reform, $250,000
Rhode Island Department of Human Services, $250,000
Vermont Department of Aging and Independent Living, $249,416
Washington Department of Social and Health Services, $250,000
West Virginia Bureau of Senior Services, $250,000

Traditionally, state Medicaid programs have contracted with home care agencies to provide personal assistance services ¾ such as bathing, dressing, grooming, preparing meals, and housekeeping ¾ to the elderly and younger people with disabilities. Although those who are eligible for services may be able to choose among available agencies, frequently their decision-making power ends there. They often have little say in who provides the services or even when or how they are provided.

The experimental Cash & Counseling program was launched in 1995 to give Medicaid beneficiaries choice and control over their personal care needs. It provides a self-directed, individualized budget to recipients of Medicaid personal care services. Participants use the money to hire their own caregivers or purchase items ¾ such as chair lifts or touch lamps ¾ that help them live independently. Each person'™s budget is comparable to the value of services that he or she would have received from an agency. Consulting and bookkeeping services are available to help participants weigh their options and keep up with required paperwork.

'œProviding more choice and control to people who are capable of managing these very personal daily activities makes a tremendous difference in improving their quality of life,' said Kevin Mahoney, PhD, director of the Cash & Counseling program and a professor of social work at Boston College. 'œWith 11 new states launching programs, we hope we'™re that much closer to the day when every state will make this voluntary option available to Medicaid beneficiaries who have disabilities.'

Unlike the three original demonstration programs, the new round of Cash & Counseling programs will not include control groups. Grantee states will need to secure 1915(c) or 1115 waivers from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in order to implement a participant-directed individual budget model for Medicaid.

The Boston College Graduate School of Social Work will serve as the National Program Office for the new program. The program is sponsored jointly by RWJF, ASPE, and the AOA. In addition, CMS reviews states'™ Section 1115 demonstration or 1915 (c) waiver applications and provides continuing oversight and technical assistance in the waiver process.

More information on Cash & Counseling is available online at www.cashandcounseling.org or through RWJF'™s Website at www.rwjf.org.

For more information, contact:
Joe Sutherland or Colleen Chapman,
301-652-1558

Model Program that Improves Quality of Life for Elderly Medicaid Beneficiaries and Those with Disabilities Expands to 11 New States

Evaluation of Original Three-State Cash & Counseling Program Found Participants Much More Satisfied with Services Received When They Direct Their Own Care. Expanded Program will Give Thousands More the Opportunity to Exercise Choice and Control Over the Supportive Services They Receive

BOSTON (October 7, 2004) '“ Funders of the original three-state Cash & Counseling program announced today that 11 new states will receive three-year grants of approximately $250,000 each to replicate and expand the successful program, which allows people eligible to receive supportive services through Medicaid to direct their own care and live more independently. The program is funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) and the Administration on Aging (AOA) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Syndicate content