Summary: Statistics on the size and scope of eldercare issues
The care needs of the elderly population are significant. As they age, people face numerous, overlapping problems related to isolation, failing health, and physical and mental limitations. The problems of the frail elderly are magnified when the elderly person lives alone, especially when they and their children are geographically separated. Elderly people with health or other physical or mental problems are often referred to as the "frail elderly" to distinguish them from those who are elderly but still healthy and independent. Many of the elderly have no one nearby who can provide assistance to them. One out of five have no living children. One-third of those with living children live more than 30 minutes away from their children. Many live alone.
Some quotes and articles which illustrate the scope of the problems:
A study by Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York and United Hospital Fund found the "vast but vulnerable base upon which our chronic care system rests" The study estimates unpaid caregiving for ailing adults costs $200 billion per year, and notes "The estimate dwarfs actual spending for home health care ($32 billion) and nursing home care ($83 billion) and is roughly equivalent to one-fifth of the nation's total annual health care costs." (Source: National Council on Aging)
"We’ve learned that while people usually prepare for career, retirement, and the generation that follows, they do not anticipate caring for a parent. Few realize the time involved, or the lifestyle changes they will encounter in caring for a parent. Instead, people tell themselves that "I’m sure Mom and Dad have that covered. They have insurance and then there’s Medicare." Or we’ve heard, "We’ll cross that bridge when we get to it." But when adult children suddenly have to cross that bridge, they look frantically for answers and options. (Source: National Council on Aging)
"More Americans worry about paying for long-term care than paying for retirement, according to a survey of 1,000 adults. The survey, released by the National Council on the Aging (NCOA) and John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., also found that seven out of 10 Americans flunked a quiz about the basic facts of long-term care. In addition, 48 percent of respondents indicated they have done little or no long-term care planning. (Source: National Council on Aging)
27% of Baby Boomers think they are covered by long term care insurance, but very few actually carry this coverage. 80% do not know how long term care is paid for and 25% say they are unwilling to consider paying for any additional insurance to cover these costs, according to a report from the American Health Care Association .
Older adults are concerned about their security but someone else is worrying about them more: their adult children, according to a study released by The National Council on the Aging and SecurityLink from Ameritech, a division of Ameritech Corporation. " (Source: National Council on Aging)
Though more dramatic than most, the incident was one of many that play themselves out every day and illustrate the need for expanded adult day care and assisted living services, aging activists say. The Associated Press highlighted the issue in a nationwide story Dec. 22, noting that demand for the "guilt-free alternatives to nursing homes is growing rapidly." (Source: National Council on Aging)
Nearly 7 million Americans provide care or manage care for a relative or friend aged 55 or older who lives at least one hour away, according to a survey cosponsored by The National Council on the Aging (NCOA) and The Pew Charitable Trusts... Long-distance care is a large and growing concern to baby boomers. The average age of the caregivers interviewed was 46, and nearly half of them were boomers. The survey indicates that approximately 3.3 million boomers are providing long-distance care. We expect that the number of long-distance caregivers will more than double over the next 15 years as the baby boomers and their parents age. (Source: National Council on Aging)
The number of persons requiring formal care (mainly nursing home care) and informal care (mainly care at home) will rise sharply even if the share of persons at each age remains unchanged. Accordingly, there will be a large increase in the numbers participating in various entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare. Living alone presents an additional risk, and the risk mounts when the person living alone has no children or siblings. These characteristics are more common among those 85 years and over as compared with those under age 85. At ages 65 and over only 2 percent of the population have these characteristics in combination, but at ages 85 and over perhaps 6 percent have them. The outlook for the longevity and health of the elderly is not altogether clear. There will probably be a substantial increase in life expectancy, even at the older ages, but there are also likely to be large increases in the number of persons with poor health and disabilities, including Alzheimer's disease (and in persons requiring nursing home care and home care), if only because of the massive population increases projected to occur. (Source: Aging into the 21st Century)
Federal and state governments paid 41 percent of the costs of chronic care in 1987; private insurance paid 33 percent, and individuals paid 22 percent out-of-pocket...Nursing homes are a particularly costly segment of the chronic care continuum, a primary reason most reforms in the chronic care system include methods to help people remain independent and out of institutions for as long as possible. Recent data indicate that Americans pay 33 percent of the total costs of nursing home care out-of-pocket ($23 billion). The public sector pays an even greater share: Medicaid's 52 percent represented an expense of $36 billion. (Source: Chronic Care in America, A 21st Century Challenge)
GAO noted that: (1) spending for long-term care for the elderly totaled almost $91 billion in 1995, the most recent year for which expenditures from all sources were available; (2) almost 40 percent of these dollars were paid for by the elderly and their families and almost 60 percent by Medicaid and Medicare; (3) these amounts, however, do not include many hidden costs of long-term care, since an estimated two-thirds of the disabled elderly living in the community rely exclusively on their families and other unpaid sources for their care. (Source: General Accounting Office)
Statistics from Profile of Older Americans 1998:
The older population-persons 65 years or older-numbered 34.1 million in 1997. They represented 12.7% of the U.S. population, about one in every eight Americans
The older population itself is getting older. In 1997 the 65-74 age group (18.5 million) was eight times larger than in 1900, but the 75-84 group (11.7million) was 16 times larger and the 85+ group (3.9 million) was 31 times larger
Almost half of all older women in 1997 were widows (46%)
About 31% (9.9 million) of all noninstitutionalized older persons in 1997 lived alone
While a small number (1.4 million) and percentage (4%) of the 65+ population lived in nursing homes in 1995, the percentage increased dramatically with age, ranging from 1% for persons 65-74 years to 5% for persons 75-84 years and 15% for persons 85+
In 1994-95 more than half of the older population (52.5%) reported having at least one disability. One-third had a severe disability (ies). The percentages with disabilities increase sharply with age (Figure 6). Over 4.4 million (14%) had difficulty in carrying out activities of daily living (ADLs) and 6.5 million (21%) reported difficulties with instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). [ADLs include bathing, dressing, eating, and getting around the house. IADLs include preparing meals, shopping, managing money, using the telephone, doing housework, and taking medication].
Older people accounted for 40% of all hospital stays and 49% of all days of care in hospitals in 1995. The average length of a hospital stay was 7.1 days for older people, compared to only 5.4days for people under 65. The average length of stay for older people has decreased 5.0 days since 1964. Older persons averaged more contacts with doctors in 1995 than did persons under 65 (11.1 contacts vs. 5 contacts).
Summary: Statistics on the size and scope of eldercare issues
The care needs of the elderly population are significant. As they age, people face numerous, overlapping problems related to isolation, failing health, and physical and mental limitations. The problems of the frail elderly are magnified when the elderly person lives alone, especially when they and their children are geographically separated. Elderly people with health or other physical or mental problems are often referred to as the "frail elderly" to distinguish them from those who are elderly but still healthy and independent. Many of the elderly have no one nearby who can provide assistance to them. One out of five have no living children. One-third of those with living children live more than 30 minutes away from their children. Many live alone.
How has the source of payment for home health care services changed over the years? I've collected statistics which show the increasing role of Medicaid and Medicare, which now cover about 55% of the cost, and the resulting decline in the portion paid from other private sources from 1960 to 1997. The percentage paid by insurance is creeping up, but is still only 11%. About 22% of the cost is still paid out-of-pocket!
| Out of pocket | Health Insurance | Other Private | Medicare | Medicaid | Other Public | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | 7,024 | 3,698 | 3,944 | 12,767 | 4,756 | 131 | 32,320 |
| 1996 | 6,505 | 3,486 | 3,676 | 13,168 | 4,197 | 130 | 31,162 |
| 1995 | 6,220 | 3,369 | 3,528 | 11,936 | 3,928 | 103 | 29,084 |
| 1994 | 5,904 | 3,251 | 3,368 | 9,989 | 3,592 | 90 | 26,194 |
| 1993 | 5,592 | 3,111 | 3,201 | 7,747 | 3,235 | 79 | 22,965 |
| 1992 | 5,040 | 2,885 | 2,915 | 5,880 | 2,829 | 74 | 19,623 |
| 1991 | 4,310 | 2,527 | 2,515 | 4,230 | 2,420 | 48 | 16,050 |
| 1990 | 3,613 | 2,245 | 2,155 | 3,023 | 2,053 | 27 | 13,116 |
| 1989 | 2,895 | 1,888 | 1,759 | 2,014 | 1,655 | 22 | 10,233 |
| 1988 | 2,501 | 1,499 | 1,472 | 1,618 | 1,307 | 24 | 8,421 |
| 1987 | 1,787 | 1,089 | 1,078 | 1,485 | 1,188 | 27 | 6,654 |
| 1986 | 1,567 | 972 | 1,286 | 1,532 | 1,010 | 16 | 6,383 |
| 1985 | 1,277 | 800 | 1,085 | 1,596 | 872 | 12 | 5,642 |
| 1984 | 1,105 | 699 | 972 | 1,572 | 721 | 12 | 5,081 |
| 1983 | 918 | 586 | 836 | 1,336 | 609 | 11 | 4,296 |
| 1982 | 758 | 490 | 716 | 1,095 | 483 | 9 | 3,551 |
| 1981 | 641 | 419 | 627 | 846 | 413 | 7 | 2,953 |
| 1980 | 523 | 392 | 509 | 651 | 296 | 6 | 2,377 |
| 1979 | 384 | 301 | 418 | 550 | 241 | 5 | 1,899 |
| 1978 | 301 | 250 | 366 | 443 | 191 | 4 | 1,555 |
| 1977 | 203 | 161 | 258 | 359 | 162 | 5 | 1,148 |
| 1976 | 160 | 111 | 208 | 278 | 134 | 4 | 895 |
| 1975 | 106 | 65 | 170 | 192 | 86 | 4 | 623 |
| 1974 | 62 | 33 | 156 | 130 | 38 | 4 | 423 |
| 1973 | 37 | 18 | 116 | 81 | 22 | 2 | 276 |
| 1972 | 30 | 12 | 92 | 62 | 22 | 2 | 220 |
| 1971 | 25 | 9 | 85 | 53 | 20 | 2 | 194 |
| 1970 | 26 | 9 | 108 | 60 | 15 | 1 | 219 |
| 1969 | 31 | 9 | 145 | 77 | 9 | 2 | 273 |
| 1968 | 26 | 7 | 130 | 68 | 5 | 2 | 238 |
| 1967 | 18 | 4 | 88 | 49 | 3 | 0 | 162 |
| 1966 | 16 | 3 | 77 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 108 |
| 1965 | 13 | 3 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89 |
| 1964 | 10 | 2 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 74 |
| 1963 | 10 | 2 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69 |
| 1962 | 10 | 2 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 65 |
| 1961 | 9 | 2 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 61 |
| 1960 | 9 | 2 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 58 |
Source: Health Care Financing Administration, Office of the Actuary: National Health Statistics Group
See the supporting data at http://www.hcfa.gov/stats/nhe-oact/nhe.htm
How has the source of payment for home health care services changed over the years? I've collected statistics which show the increasing role of Medicaid and Medicare, which now cover about 55% of the cost, and the resulting decline in the portion paid from other private sources from 1960 to 1997. The percentage paid by insurance is creeping up, but is still only 11%. About 22% of the cost is still paid out-of-pocket!
To do a quick search of documents on the web sites of the Administration on Aging, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, National Institutes of Health, Federal Register or others, enter a search term into the box of the site you wish to search, then press "GO" to jump to that site and retrieve results. The link to the "Advanced Search" for each site takes you to that organization's on-site search form, where you will find more search options and links to tips on how to most effectively search that particular database. Scroll down this page for a brief paragraph describing the kind of information you can find in each database.
To do a quick search of documents on the web sites of the Administration on Aging, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, National Institutes of Health, Federal Register or others, enter a search term into the box of the site you wish to search, then press "GO" to jump to that site and retrieve results. The link to the "Advanced Search" for each site takes you to that organization's on-site search form, where you will find more search options and links to tips on how to most effectively search that particular database. Scroll down this page for a brief paragraph describing the kind of information you can find in each database.
The Census Bureau released its survey measuring geographic mobility from March 1998 to March 1999. The data show distinct differences in mobility patterns by age. Few older people move at all, and even fewer move any great distance. Of those that do, the most dramatic migration is right around age 65, when many move from the Northeast and Midwest to the South, and a smaller migration for those at older ages, who are migrating mostly to the West.


We can't plan adequately for eldercare needs without knowing the costs, so we need to quantify those costs. In searching for statistical information on the costs of aging, I was not able to find everything I was looking for, but I did find a number of interesting statistics which cast some light on what people over age 65 might expect to pay for housing and care-related expenses as they age.

Average life expectancy has increased by about 15 years since the Social Security program was implemented in the 1930s. If the eligibility age for Social Security and Medicare had increased along with the average life expectancy, it would have risen from age 65 to age 80 by this time. If people were retiring at that later age, the funding problems for the Social Security and Medicare programs would be eliminated, but our lives and expectations would be far different!
Life expectancy changes once one reaches age 65, since not everyone will reach that age. If one lives to age 65, they can now expect to live 16-19 more years. By 2050, when the baby boom generation retires, average remaining life expectancy at age 65 is expected to be over 20 years. That 20 year period is what we need to plan to fund.
The population over age 65 are very disproportionate users of healthcare. Although they represent 12% of the total population, they account for 36% of total national healthcare expenditures, 36% of hospital stays (admissions), and nearly 50% of all days in the hospital!
People over age 65 have far higher medical expenses than those under age 65, and the projections are that their costs will rise at a far faster rate than healthcare costs for younger people. By 2005, non-institutionalized people over age 65 may average over $14,000 per year of healthcare expenses, over four times the cost of those under age 65. Because these statistics are for the community-based population, this figure does not include the cost of long term care.
The average cost of medical expenditures for the community-based population over age 65 is primarily for hospital costs, but physician, home health, and prescription medicines also represent significant expenditures. Of particular interest is the projected $1,000 of annual cost for prescription medicines, a cost which is not covered by the standard fee-for-service Medicare program.
Looking at the source of payments for these healthcare costs provides some insight into the need for insurance. Only about half of these costs are covered by Medicare, a fact which many people are unaware of. The remaining half of per capita expected costs, about $7,000 a year in 2005, must be paid for out-of-pocket, or by Medicaid or private insurance.
The out-of-pocket expenditures of all Medicare beneficiaries highlight the gaps in the Medicare program. Although hospital costs made up the largest part of the incurred costs, they are a very small part of the out-of-pocket expenses of the average Medicare beneficiary since hospital care is well covered by Medicare. The biggest out-of-pocket expenses are for long term care, pharmacy, and dental expenses, most of which are not covered by Medicare, and for physician services not covered by Medicare. Some of this out-of-pocket expense is in the form of patient deductibles and co-insurance for covered care, and some for uncovered services.
Most people who have Medicare insurance will need supplemental insurance to cover some of the significant co-insurance and deductibles left by Medicare. This insurance could be provided by a private commercial Medigap policy. Medigap policies were standardized by the federal government into 10 policies, called Plan A through Plan J, so that beneficiaries could more easily compare policies from one insurer to another.
Even with this standardization, premiums vary considerably. In this example, taken from data posted by the Illinois Department of Insurance on their Web site, the cost of Medigap policies in the Chicago area varies from $440/year to $5,600/year, depending on the plan, the insurance carrier, and the age at which it is purchased!
Older people will generally elect Medicare Part B coverage, which requires a premium paid to the federal government. That premium is currently about $45/month. This provides coverage for physician and other charges.
The Part B premium is also required if a beneficiary elects a Medicare HMO as an alternative to standard Medicare. A Medigap policy would not be needed for a beneficiary who elects a Medicare HMO, and the HMO premiums are generally less than Medigap premiums, but there are trade-offs for that lower premium, since the Medicare HMO controls which providers and what services the beneficiary can use. There have also been problems when Medicare HMOs have dropped out of the program, requiring the beneficiaries to find alternatives.
Older people may also want to purchase long term care insurance. The premiums for long term care insurance vary widely based on the age at which it is purchased, the sex of the beneficiary, the amount of coverage elected, the waiting period, and a host of other options.
Just to provide a simple example of the potential gross cost of insurance premiums which would accumulate over the 20 years of retirement, this chart shows that gross, non-inflated, insurance premium costs could be $50,000 to over $100,000 over that time, a significant expense many people fail to plan for.
Assisted living is a fairly new level of care. It is appropriate for people who are not able to manage for themselves at home, but who don't require 24 hour a day nursing care or daily therapy. This is a type of care which is highly desirable to consumers, but it cannot be funded by Medicare, and there are few places in the country which are licensed to take Medicaid payments. Consequently, the money for this type of service often has to come from private long term care insurance or out-of-pocket.
Independent living is the lowest level of care. People in independent living are still able to take care of themselves and remain independent, but benefit from socialization, transportation, a dining room, or housekeeping services. On average, people in these types of facilities are about 75. At younger ages, most people would not see the benefit to moving out of the family home.
People don't generally move into assisted living facilities until a later date, and they average 83 years old and stay about two years. Nursing home residents average age 85 and stay there an average of 1-2 years.
One common reason for the need for either assisted living or nursing home care is dementia, most commonly Alzheimers. About 1/3 of assisted living residents and about 1/2 of nursing home residents have dementia problems. Dementia is difficult to handle in a person's home unless a full-time caregiver is available, which is not always the case. Even when a caregiver is available, they may not be able to manage a patient with aggression, nighttime wandering, or other common manifestations as Alzheimers progresses.
Another reason why a person may need to move to assisted living or a nursing home is that they require assistance with the activities of daily living (ADLs). These include needs for assistance in dressing, bathing, eating, toileting, or moving around. When people require help with multiple ADLs, it may be difficult or impossible to provide that help in the person's home. Over 50% of people over age 85 require assistance with ADLs.
Interestingly, only a small percentage of the population over age 65 is institutionalized. Even at age 85 and over, 85% are still living in some non-institutional setting.
One sign of the changing ways we provide care to older people is the decline in the average length of stay in a nursing home. That has dropped from 34 months in 1985 to 28 months in 1995, a six-month reduction!
It's important to understand the real likelihood of the need for nursing home care, and the length of time it might be needed, in order to plan and purchase appropriate levels of insurance. Generally, about 40% of people who spend time in nursing homes stay for less than one year, 30% stay 1-2 years, and 30% stay over 2 years.
These numbers will probably change as patterns of use of long term care changes. Assisted living facilities are drawing many people who would have been in a nursing home in the past, and as they become more widely available and affordable, the use of assisted living will probably impact these statistics.
Costs vary widely from region to region, but these are some statistics which compare the costs of different types of healthcare.
Costs also vary widely depending on the level of services provided in different long term care settings.
Just to get some idea of the gross dollars at stake, this chart shows the non-inflated, accumulated cost of spending different amounts of time in assisted living and nursing home facilities, including potential entrance fees (which may or may not be required, and which also vary widely in amount.) As you can see, the potential cost is several hundred thousand dollars.
The potential costs are significant, easily accumulating to a hundred thousand dollars or more. Yet most people are unaware of these costs and do not plan for them. Appropriate planning can have a real impact on actual costs, by doing things like selecting the right insurance for the right situation, and understanding all the alternatives available in order to choose the most cost-effective solutions to problems.
We can't plan adequately for eldercare needs without knowing the costs, so we need to quantify those costs. In searching for statistical information on the costs of aging, I was not able to find everything I was looking for, but I did find a number of interesting statistics which cast some light on what people over age 65 might expect to pay for housing and care-related expenses as they age.

Average life expectancy has increased by about 15 years since the Social Security program was implemented in the 1930s. If the eligibility age for Social Security and Medicare had increased along with the average life expectancy, it would have risen from age 65 to age 80 by this time. If people were retiring at that later age, the funding problems for the Social Security and Medicare programs would be eliminated, but our lives and expectations would be far different!
The U.S. Census Bureau has released state-by-state Census 2000 data that includes breakdowns of the population by age. We have created summaries for each state showing what percentage of the population is age 55+, age 65+, age 75+, age 85+, age 55-64, age 65-74, and age 75-84, calculating the rate of increase for each age group and comparing that to the national ratios and to the data for the 1990 census.
The data also includes figures on the number of households that include anyone age 65 or older (23% nationally) and what percentage of the age 65+ population lives alone (28% nationally).
The Canadian Institute for Health Information has released a new report called "Health Care in Canada 2000". This report looks at the performance of Canada's health care system, including the way that it adapts to the health care needs of seniors. The report analyzed the Canadian system, and compared it to systems in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. In general, the report found that the confidence Canadians have in their health care system has dropped in the last 10 years. In 1991 about of Canadians 60% rated their system as good or better, but that had dropped to only about 25% by the year 2000.
Although only 12% of Canadians are age 65 or older, they account for 43% of all health care spending by provincial and territorial governments. Canadian seniors rated the quality of their medical care lower than did seniors in the United States, Australia, or New Zealand, although they were happier with their care than seniors in the United Kingdom.
About 185,000 Canadian seniors were living in nursing homes and other institutions in 1996/97. The average age of women in these facilities was 83 and the average age of men was far lower, 69. In addition, about 12% of Canadian seniors received publicly-funded home care services.
The report found that about 26% of Canadian seniors who had children often relied on their children as caregivers. One in four Canadians reported providing some sort of care to a family member in their home, and a study in Alberta found that 36% of respondents reported providing some sort of emotional, personal, or financial support to a family member in the last six months.
Both nurses and doctors in Canada are getting older themselves, leading to concerns about who will provide care to aging Canadians in the future. Nearly 40% of the physicians in Canada were age 50 or older in 1999, up from 35% in 1995. 90% of the nurses in Canada are over age 30, and more than 24% are age 50 or older.
The Canadian Institute for Health Information has released a new report called "Health Care in Canada 2000". This report looks at the performance of Canada's health care system, including the way that it adapts to the health care needs of seniors. The report analyzed the Canadian system, and compared it to systems in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. In general, the report found that the confidence Canadians have in their health care system has dropped in the last 10 years. In 1991 about of Canadians 60% rated their system as good or better, but that had dropped to only about 25% by the year 2000.
The U.S. Census Bureau has just released new data on the prevalence of disabilities and need for assistance in the American population. This data is not from the 2000 census, which is not yet available, but is from 1997 census data. According to these statistics, the percentage of the older population with disabilities, by age, is:
| Some Disability | Severe Disability | Need Assistance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65 to 69 years | 44.9% | 30.7% | 8.1% |
| 70 to 74 years | 46.6% | 28.3% | 10.5% |
| 75 to 79 years | 57.7% | 38.0% | 16.9% |
| 80 years and over | 73.6% | 57.6% | 34.9% |
The U.S. Census Bureau has just released new data on the prevalence of disabilities and need for assistance in the American population. This data is not from the 2000 census, which is not yet available, but is from 1997 census data. According to these statistics, the percentage of the older population with disabilities, by age, is:
Health Canada has released its annual report, which includes an overview of "extended services" (nursing home and home and community care) in each province or territory. These extended services are not covered by the federal program, so they differ from region to region.
Health Canada has released its annual report, which includes an overview of "extended services" (nursing home and home and community care) in each province or territory. These extended services are not covered by the federal program, so they differ from region to region.
Alberta Canada Minister of Health and Wellness Gary Mar released the results of a survey of Albertans on the quality of their health care. He stated that the report shows that Albertans are generally happy with the health care they receive, since 86% rated the overall quality of their health care as good. Their assessment of the health care system improved, with 63% saying it was excellent or good, up from 57% in the prior year. On the other hand, their belief that access and availability of services was adequate dropped from 74% to 63% on availability of services, and from 73% to 64% on access to services. 79% said they waited less than one week for an appointment with a family physician, which was no change from the prior year.
Alberta Canada Minister of Health and Wellness Gary Mar released the results of a survey of Albertans on the quality of their health care. He stated that the report shows that Albertans are generally happy with the health care they receive, since 86% rated the overall quality of their health care as good. Their assessment of the health care system improved, with 63% saying it was excellent or good, up from 57% in the prior year. On the other hand, their belief that access and availability of services was adequate dropped from 74% to 63% on availability of services, and from 73% to 64% on access to services. 79% said they waited less than one week for an appointment with a family physician, which was no change from the prior year.
"The image of older people as frail, unproductive and dependent on others is grossly exaggerated," says Dr. Robert N. Butler, president of the International Longevity Center-USA which issued the report entitled Charting the Productivity and Independence of Older Persons. The first in a series of "International Longevity Reports" to be published by the New York center for research on longevity and population aging, the study is the first ever to compile and compare statistics on the condition of older people in the U.S., the U.K., Canada, France, Germany and Japan.
Far from being a financial burden to their families, older persons are more likely to be shouldering the ?burden? of their own children and grandchildren. According to a 1995 study of intergenerational transfers of wealth cited in the report, the financial contributions of American parents to their children exceed -- in both frequency and amount ? the financial contributions of American children to their parents.
In the United States, close to 20 percent of family heads aged 65-74 have income from earnings as well as from retirement. American women are more likely than ever to be working at paying jobs in later life. The labor force participation of American women aged 60-64 increased between the years 1975 and 1992. "This is an important trend," Dr. Butler points out. "With millions of baby boomers on the verge of retirement, it would be a terrible waste of talent to have them sitting idly for 20 or 30 years, collecting Social Security and utilizing Medicare."
"The image of older people as frail, unproductive and dependent on others is grossly exaggerated," says Dr. Robert N. Butler, president of the International Longevity Center-USA which issued the report entitled Charting the Productivity and Independence of Older Persons. The first in a series of "International Longevity Reports" to be published by the New York center for research on longevity and population aging, the study is the first ever to compile and compare statistics on the condition of older people in the U.S., the U.K., Canada, France, Germany and Japan.
Far from being a financial burden to their families, older persons are more likely to be shouldering the ?burden? of their own children and grandchildren. According to a 1995 study of intergenerational transfers of wealth cited in the report, the financial contributions of American parents to their children exceed -- in both frequency and amount ? the financial contributions of American children to their parents.
The intent of this document is to provide an inventory of the surveys, databases, publications, articles and work in progress in Statistics Canada that relate to Canada?s retirement income programs. The inventory provides information on publications, output and relevant data elements produced by the surveys and databases. It does not provide an exhaustive description of these data sources, but instead focuses on the information that can be used for purposes of researching/analysing retirement income programs. Some of the information contained does not specifically relate to these programs but might be used as a secondary source when doing research in this area.
The intent of this document is to provide an inventory of the surveys, databases, publications, articles and work in progress in Statistics Canada that relate to Canada?s retirement income programs. The inventory provides information on publications, output and relevant data elements produced by the surveys and databases. It does not provide an exhaustive description of these data sources, but instead focuses on the information that can be used for purposes of researching/analysing retirement income programs. Some of the information contained does not specifically relate to these programs but might be used as a secondary source when doing research in this area.
The World Health Organization (WHO) issued their first-ever report assessing the quality of the health systems of the world. After assessing a variety of factors relating to cost and outcomes, they report that France and Italy rank #1 and #2, while the United States comes in at #37 out of the 191 countries examined.
As examples of the kinds of problems which kept the U.S. out of the top rankings, the report noted that there are still 40 million uninsured Americans caught in a patchwork of different quality private insurance and government programs. They said that Americans are good at expensive, heroic care, but very poor at the low-cost preventive care that keeps Europeans healthy. The United States spends a stunning $3,724 per person on health each year. But by measuring how long people live in good health -- not just how long they live -- the Japanese beat Americans by four-and-a-half years, and the French lived three more healthy years, even though Japan spends just $1,750 per person on health and France $2,100.
The World Health Organization (WHO) issued their first-ever report assessing the quality of the health systems of the world. After assessing a variety of factors relating to cost and outcomes, they report that France and Italy rank #1 and #2, while the United States comes in at #37 out of the 191 countries examined.
As examples of the kinds of problems which kept the U.S. out of the top rankings, the report noted that there are still 40 million uninsured Americans caught in a patchwork of different quality private insurance and government programs. They said that Americans are good at expensive, heroic care, but very poor at the low-cost preventive care that keeps Europeans healthy. The United States spends a stunning $3,724 per person on health each year. But by measuring how long people live in good health -- not just how long they live -- the Japanese beat Americans by four-and-a-half years, and the French lived three more healthy years, even though Japan spends just $1,750 per person on health and France $2,100.
The United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) ranked 191 nations using a new indicator to calculate the number of years of health people in each country can expect to have. Through the Disability Adjusted Life Expectancy (DALE) measurement, years of ill-health are weighted according to severity and then subtracted from overall life expectancy to calculate the number of years of healthy life. The DALE calculation showed the countries where babies born in 1999 can expect to have the most number of years of healthy life are:
# 1 - 74.5 years - Japan
# 2 - 73.2 years - Australia
# 3 - 73.1 years - France
# 4 - 73.0 years - Sweden
# 5 - 72.7 years - Italy
Surprisingly, the United States ranked only 24th, with an average healthy life expectancy of 70 years. The bottom 10 countries are all in sub-Saharan Africa, with Sierra Leone #191 with a healthy life expectancy of only 25.9 years. The range of healthy life expectancies is breathtakingly large, with 24 countries in which babies may expect 70 or more years of healthy life, 135 countries where healthy life expectancy ranges from 40 to 70 years, and 32 countries where average healthy life expectancy is less than 40 years.
"Healthy life expectancy in some African countries is dropping back to levels we haven't seen in advanced countries since medieval times," said Alan Lopez, coordinator of WHO's Epidemiology and Burden of Disease Team.
WHO linked Japan's high rating with the country's low rate of heart disease, due partly to its traditional low fat diet, as well as fairly mild tobacco-related diseases. WHO noted that women tend to have higher DALE rates, because they smoke less, exercise more, and are generally more health conscious than men, except in North Africa and the Middle East, where women receive less care and face a high risk of reproductive deaths.
People in the healthiest regions lose about 9% of their lives to disability, while people in the worst-off countries spend about 14% of their lives in disability.
The United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) ranked 191 nations using a new indicator to calculate the number of years of health people in each country can expect to have. Through the Disability Adjusted Life Expectancy (DALE) measurement, years of ill-health are weighted according to severity and then subtracted from overall life expectancy to calculate the number of years of healthy life. The DALE calculation showed the countries where babies born in 1999 can expect to have the most number of years of healthy life are:
# 1 - 74.5 years - Japan
# 2 - 73.2 years - Australia
# 3 - 73.1 years - France
The American Council of Life Insurance released results of a study into the costs of long term care and the benefits of long term care insurance. To illustrate the needs most often ignored by consumers, they investigated the costs of long term care services OTHER than nursing homes. They reported that by 2030, when the last of the baby boom generation reaches age 65, total national spending for non-nursing home long term care costs will be $193 billion, quadruple what it is today. Out-of-pocket costs for these services are projected to climb by 369% to $112 billion.
The ACLI report also pointed out that the Congressional Budget Office had concluded that long term care insurance could save the government about $40 billion in Medicaid costs. The ACLI also projected that the government would further benefit by another $8 billion in tax revenues if the 31% of family caregivers who now quit their jobs to care for elderly relatives were able to continue working.
The American Council of Life Insurance released results of a study into the costs of long term care and the benefits of long term care insurance. To illustrate the needs most often ignored by consumers, they investigated the costs of long term care services OTHER than nursing homes. They reported that by 2030, when the last of the baby boom generation reaches age 65, total national spending for non-nursing home long term care costs will be $193 billion, quadruple what it is today. Out-of-pocket costs for these services are projected to climb by 369% to $112 billion.
The ACLI report also pointed out that the Congressional Budget Office had concluded that long term care insurance could save the government about $40 billion in Medicaid costs. The ACLI also projected that the government would further benefit by another $8 billion in tax revenues if the 31% of family caregivers who now quit their jobs to care for elderly relatives were able to continue working.
The Social Security Administration has just released a report, "Income of the Population 55 or Older, 1998". This report includes numerous statistics and tables about income sources and types for the 55+ population. The report is identified as part of a section called "Income of the Aged." Notwithstanding the insult to those who don't think 55 qualifies as "aged," the report does provide useful information to anyone who needs statistical data on this subject.
The Social Security Administration has just released a report, "Income of the Population 55 or Older, 1998". This report includes numerous statistics and tables about income sources and types for the 55+ population. The report is identified as part of a section called "Income of the Aged." Notwithstanding the insult to those who don't think 55 qualifies as "aged," the report does provide useful information to anyone who needs statistical data on this subject.
In a paper published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), researchers from Loyola University studied the changes in health and living conditions of Americans age 85 and older, to determine whether the use of health care services, disability and cognitive function, and overall quality of life in the year before death among older adults has changed over time. Among their conclusions for the over-85 group, nursing home stays were down 12%; and cognitive impairments declined about 7%; and the percentage of people who needed assistance in daily activities such as walking, bathing and dressing had dropped 9% for men and 7% for women.
In a paper published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), researchers from Loyola University studied the changes in health and living conditions of Americans age 85 and older, to determine whether the use of health care services, disability and cognitive function, and overall quality of life in the year before death among older adults has changed over time. Among their conclusions for the over-85 group, nursing home stays were down 12%; and cognitive impairments declined about 7%; and the percentage of people who needed assistance in daily activities such as walking, bathing and dressing had dropped 9% for men and 7% for women.
A study done by Rutgers University, "Out-of-Pocket Health Care Costs Among Older Americans," shows that the oldest and poorest of the elderly are hit particularly hard with medical expenses. The report says that elderly Americans average 19% of their total income on out-of-pocket medical expenses annually, with more than half of these payments going toward prescription drugs and dental care. The report states that people in the lowest income quintile spend 32% of their income on out-of-pocket medical expenses, in spite of Medicaid coverage for some of those costs, as compared with the 9% of income spent by those in the highest income brackets. The report also found that over one third of out-of-pocket payments to health providers were related to prescription drug costs. Out-of-pocket expenses used in the report include health insurance premiums, medical co-payments and prescriptions.
A study done by Rutgers University, "Out-of-Pocket Health Care Costs Among Older Americans," shows that the oldest and poorest of the elderly are hit particularly hard with medical expenses. The report says that elderly Americans average 19% of their total income on out-of-pocket medical expenses annually, with more than half of these payments going toward prescription drugs and dental care. The report states that people in the lowest income quintile spend 32% of their income on out-of-pocket medical expenses, in spite of Medicaid coverage for some of those costs, as compared with the 9% of income spent by those in the highest income brackets. The report also found that over one third of out-of-pocket payments to health providers were related to prescription drug costs. Out-of-pocket expenses used in the report include health insurance premiums, medical co-payments and prescriptions.