ElderWeb

Award-winning online eldercare sourcebook

Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States population

Kenneth G. Manton* and XiLiang Gu (May 22, 2001). Proc. National Academy of Science USA.
Summary: Kenneth G. Manton* and XiLiang Gu (May 22, 2001). Proc. National Academy of Science USA.
Kenneth G. Manton* and XiLiang Gu (May 22, 2001). Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999. Proc. National Academy of Science USA.

Date Source and Date: Age-, sex-, and race-specific estimates of the number of persons with chronic disability from the 1982, 1984, 1989, 1994, and 1999 National Long-Term Care Survey (NLTCS),the use of nursing home beds by elderly persons in the 1985 to 1995 National Nursing Home Surveys (NNHS), and nursing home expenditures from the 1987 to 1996 Medical Expenditures Surveys (MEPS).

Research Methodology: All five NLTCS samples were drawn from Medicare administrative records. This list sample frame maintained near-perfect follow-up of persons across survey years (eliminating bias from loss to follow-up). The sample design for the 1982 NLTCS was drawn, using reduction sets of 5,000 persons, from 55,000 names drawn from Medicare lists. A reduction set was the predefined number of cases screened until a sufficient number of sets had been processed to identify 6,000 chronically disabled persons to receive detailed community interviews. Chronic disability rates were calculated by using as denominators estimates of the size of the population aged 65+ at risk made from sample-weighted counts of persons in each cell. In 1994 and 1999 NLTCS samples were supplemented three ways. First, an over-sample of persons age 95+ was drawn in 1994 (n = 540) and 1999 (n = 600) to improve the precision of estimates for this extreme elderly population. Second, to improve estimates made of the traits of nondisabled persons the sample receiving a detailed community interview was augmented in 1994 by 1,762 persons designated to receive a community interview even though they would not otherwise have received one based on their screen interview (sample component H).

Findings: Dramatic reductions in disability and nursing home use occurred for all age groups above 65, and were largest for persons older than 85.

Observation #1: The decline in disability rates is increasing at an accelerating pace.


 
Time PeriodDecline in Disability Rates
Per Annum
1982-19991.7%
 
1982-19891.0%
1989-19941.0%
1994-19992.7%
1982 1984 1989 1994 1999

Distribution by disability, % 
  Nondisabled 73.8 73.8 75.6 77.5 80.3
  IADL only 5.7 6.2 4.8 4.4 3.2
  1 or 2 ADLs 6.9 7.0 6.7 6.1 6.0
  3 or 4 ADLs 3.0 3.1 3.7 3.4 3.5
  5 or 6 ADLs 3.7 3.4 3.0 3.0 2.9
  Institutional 6.8 6.6 6.1 5.7 4.2

Distribution by housing, % 
  Housing units 91.9 92.2 93.1 93.3 92.6
  Assisted-living community* 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3
  Nursing home **6.2 5.9 5.8 5.4 3.4
  Others 2.0 1.9 1.1 1.3 1.8
Total disabled, % 26.2 26.2 24.4 22.5 19.7
Year 82-89 89-94 94-99
Standardized decline rate, % per year 0.26 0.38 0.56

* Over 50% report no disability.
** Estimated by 1984 nursing home ratio (only community interviews were conducted in 1982).

Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999

Topics: